<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study of Adoption of CMM-based SPI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markstaples.com/2006/03/03/study-of-adoption-of-cmm-based-spi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markstaples.com/2006/03/03/study-of-adoption-of-cmm-based-spi/</link>
	<description>Ruminations and observations about software, technology, and beer.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: liming</title>
		<link>http://www.markstaples.com/2006/03/03/study-of-adoption-of-cmm-based-spi/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>liming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 03:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markstaples.com/?p=14#comment-22</guid>
		<description>nice one! Though I have studied the systematic review guideline and seen a few semi-systematic reviews, the thoroughness of this one impresses me. 

However, the kind of stuff you can find in a literature seems to have limited the question you can answer...understandable. Iff we have a better reporting guideline on such SPI literature, maybe more interesting questions can be addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one! Though I have studied the systematic review guideline and seen a few semi-systematic reviews, the thoroughness of this one impresses me. </p>
<p>However, the kind of stuff you can find in a literature seems to have limited the question you can answer&#8230;understandable. Iff we have a better reporting guideline on such SPI literature, maybe more interesting questions can be addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
